Selling off Public Assets and the Community at Port Botany

We have biosecurity breaches Fire Ant unregulated pollution ship_pollution_  noise noise and ever more container truckstruck

as well as loss of recreational assets.  The promised jobs have been automated.  A Disabled Access Fishing Platform would have been small compensation BUT the new private owner demonstrates no desire to be a good neighbour.

Disabled access fishing platform Stockton 15-03-2011 11-12-51 AM (Pictured:  Disabled Access Fishing Platform, Stockton, Newcastle)

When the sale/lease of Port Botany was announced April 13, 2013   Brett Himbury the CEO of Industry Funds Management(IFM) was quoted as saying that he was “very conscious of the impact and the needs of the community”.  One of the needs for residents and visitors to North Botany Bay is better access to recreational facilities.  Just as the Port will grow from 2 million  to 10 million TEU so too will demand for recreational facilities as residential densities increase around Matraville, Little Bay, Mascot, Botany, Hillsdale, Eastlakes, Pagewood, Green Square.

During the debate on the Ports Assets (Authorised Transactions) Bill 2012 requests were made to keep Molineux Point in public hands.   See Save Molineux   While unsuccessful, assurances were given by Treasurer Baird  that the terms of the lease agreement would provide protections for the State and the local community that had not been provided when the Airport was ‘sold/leased’.  Consistent with this undertaking, on February 8th, 2013, an officer from Fisheries advised that a Disabled Access Fishing Platform would be fully funded at Molineux.  It was only a matter of fixing up the details when the new owner was known.

cyclingHowever, the new owner’s staff (ex-Sydney Ports staff) advised against such a facility at Molineux.  This once public asset is locked up from sunset to sunrise and often not opened at sunrise for morning cyclists and walkers (see photograph).

What is intended for Molineux Point and Prince of Wales Drive? Whatever the plans it is clear that the assurances given to community have been worthless.

BHBrett Himbury, chief executive of Industry Funds Management, which led the bid, said he was “very conscious of the impact and the needs of the community”.

“Yes, we see increase in volumes (when ports are privatised). Yes, we see an increased return to our investors. But the communities at large are very happy.”

MB During the debate on the Ports Assets(Authorised Transactions) Bill 2012, Premier Mike Baird (then Treasurer) stated

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s