10 years since Port Botany Expansion approved

sartorIt is 10 years (13th October 2005) since Frank Sartor overruled the recommendations of a Commission of Inquiry and approved the 3rd Terminal expansion for Port Botany.

Brereton’s Railing Port Botany’s Containers Report was released the same day.  The target for rail share expressed in that report was 40% by 2011.  In 2011 Port Botany was achieving less than 10% by rail.

The Ports Growth Plan released 5th October 2003 had outlined a plan for sharing the load between Port Kembla and Newcastle with Newcastle taking over as the next container port when Port Botany reached capacity, notionally 3.2million TEU.  In 2013 Port Kembla was packaged into a 99 lease taken on by NSW Ports and Newcastle container trade was capped as a condition of the lease.  In the past 10 years 2 additional coal loaders have been approved for Newcastle.

Foreshore-Beach-1In the Port Botany Expansion Environmental Impact Statement claims were made regarding jobs, conservation, and local amenities.  The image for Foreshore Beach (left) did not include warning signs about water quality.  There was no mention of Foreshore becoming the worst beach in the Sydney Basin, as reported by Beachwatch. Foreshore

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

When community members told the Commission of Inquiry that Foreshore would become an eroded gross pollutant trap the ‘experts’ hired by Sydney Ports disagreed.  Now the Port Authority of NSW has to spend $millions  on groynes to stem the erosion and signs advise that swimming should be avoided.

And what about all the jobs that would be created – 57 workers were recently sacked by the operator of the 3rd terminal, Hutchison.   But it isn’t here that jobs are needed.  In the Botany municipality the ratio of jobs per resident is almost 3:1. Port Kembla and the Hunter are where the jobs are needed but when Botany was approved investment in the Hunter Economic Zone, created to support an expanded container port, subsequently dried up.

At the Commission of Inquiry the Sydney Ports environmental consultant said that Penrhyn Estuary would decline if the expansion did not go ahead.  The main purpose of Penrhyn was to protect shorebirds including target migratory species.  At a recent Port Botany Community Consultative Committee meeting the Port Authority reported:

Of the six target species, targets for five of the six have not been met.

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to 10 years since Port Botany Expansion approved

  1. Gary Blaschke OAM says:

    Bloody hell, what a mess and a blight on Botany Bay. I’m proud to say that I had my input against one of the major balls ups by a government. Totally ignoring all the facts on Human and environmental health and going ahead with a port that is totally landlocked, what a joke!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s